Tuesday, June 28, 2005

Fallen tree, fallen world.

On the weekend my friend was telling me about how a tree fell on his house last week.

He said that all of a sudden, everything went white (lightning), there was a really loud noise (tree falling) and then everything went really black (tree blocking light into window). And he said, "I really thought Jesus was coming back!"

And you know, I really admired him at that point. The shameful truth is, if a tree fell outside my window, I don't think that thought would've come into my head. My mind is so preoccupied with the things of this world that I would never formulate that as a explanation to what I was witnessing.


But He is coming back! It's not just fable, it could be any day now. What he hypothesised was a very feasible possibility. Jesus is going to come back to earth, one of these days, and that will be the end. The old will cease, the new will come. And it really will be the definitive moment, when those who are his people will live, and those who are not will not survive. As a Christian, I look forward to this day; as someone who has friends and family who are not Christian, this thought scares me very much.

"But you, brothers, are not in darkness so that this day should surprise you like a thief. You are all sons of the light and sons of the day. We do not belong to the night or to the darkness. So then, let us not be like others, who are asleep but let us be alert and self-controlled." - 1 Thess 5:4-6


When I have in mind the realisation that this world is temporary, and that we live in hope for the world to come, everything suddenly looks so different -- stuff just become so insignificant by comparison...

Saturday, June 25, 2005

Housekeeping diplomatics.

You buy a new shirt. On the inside you see a little plastic bag with an extra button for it. You:

a) put it in the place that you keep all the extra buttons that come with clothing purchases
b) look at it wondering if you should keep it or not, put it on your desk, and six months later stumble upon it again wondering what shirt it came from
c) throw it straight away, since you know you'll lose it and you'll probably never need it

I've been told there are two types of people in the world. Keepers and throwers. I'm definitely going from the former to the latter. Definitely going from option (a) to (b) to (c).

Perhaps because of the state of my abode, I've become really intolerant of clutter. I used to keep things should I need them "someday". Now I revel in the feeling of throwing stuff out and actually seeing my carpet again. There is a sense of triumph after some serious junk-throwing. By no means am I a neat person now (pigs don't fly haha), but I no longer have that adolescent indifference to a messy room.

Today I got that irritation at clutter again, and started cleaning the house. Doesn't really seem like blogworthy news, but just hear me out.

My mother and I have different ideology when it comes to the hoarding/throwing issue. If I am somewhat left wing, then she is more conservative than the gun-wielding folk in Texas. Not only do I have to be careful of my words on this post now, the bigger challenge is to respect her and still live with the clutter in my house. I have tried to reason, I have offered to clean stuff out for her, but she insists that everything we hoard has some purpose, whether now or sometime in the perhaps future should one day the world run out of jam jars, or should I fail medicine so badly that I'll need my year 9 Signpost textbook again.

I love my mum, so up until recently I have just left things the way they were. I throw out my crap, she keeps hers.

But lately it's getting too much. I can't walk anywhere without tripping on something. So one day when no one was home, I started throwing things out like nobody's business. I was so scared that Mum would tell me off, but she never even noticed.

So today, everyone's out again, and I'm on an excavation mission once more. But the whole time I'm still thinking, is this wrong? Should I not be doing this? Is this respectful and loving? Am I still honouring my folks?

I don't know. All I know is that I want to walk around without stubbing my toes anymore.

You know I think Mum became a hoarder because Grandma used to throw everything out...

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

My favourite song of all time.

How can I own a blog without posting up my favourite everything? Well, here's my fave song. My favourite colour/food/celebrity/vacation/car/house/
suburb/train station will follow shortly, oh don't you worry my dear. =P

Paper Bag - Fiona Apple

I was staring at the sky, just lookin' for a star
To pray on or wish on or something like that
I was havin' a sweet fix of a daydream of a boy
Whose reality, I knew, was a hopeless to be had

But then the dove of hope began its downward slope
And I believed for a moment that my chances were approaching to be grabbed
But as it came down near, so did a weary tear
I thought it was a bird but it was just a paper bag

Hunger hurts and I want him so bad, oh, it kills
'Cause I know I'm a mess he don't wanna clean up
I got to fold 'cause these hands are too shaky to hold
Hunger hurts but starvin' works when it costs
Too much to love

And I went crazy again today, lookin' for a strand to climb
Lookin' for a little hope
Baby said he couldn't stay, wouldn't put his lips to mine
And a fail to kiss is a fail to cope
I said honey, I don't feel so good, don't feel justified
Come on, put a little love here in my void
He said it's all in your head and I said so's everything but he didn't get it
I thought he was a man but he was just a little boy

Hunger hurts and I want him so bad, oh, it kills
'Cause I know I'm a mess he don't wanna clean up
I got to fold 'cause these hands are too shaky to hold
Hunger hurts but starvin' works when it costs
Too much to love

PS. One day I should write an essay about this song; that's how much I revere it...

Friday, June 17, 2005

Under the influence?

I was just going to make a comment on the last post in response but I have too much to say, so I'll write here instead (but my brain's really stuck for words lately so if I sound a little disjointed you'll have to forgive me).

You bring up a really interesting point, the idea of human choice and personal responsibility. You say that in the end, "one still has the will or consciousness or whatever you want to call it to overcome the effect of the stressor". I've always believed that true, I'm a big advocate for people not blaming "environment or genetics" and picking up their own slack, but lately I've been challenged about my black-and-white approach to this whole thing.

I mean, I still believe that people have control over their moods, their behaviours. But at the same time, I've been amazed lately at how much we are influenced by the environment, all of us, making us so damn predictable in our behaviours.

Case in point: Our mood and the environment.

Within the day: We have a diurnal variation in our moods. We feel more sad in the mornings and more happy in the evenings. That is universally true, it probably has something to do with cortisol levels in the brain. I don't know if this is true, but I'll bet that's why babies cry when they wake up.

Within the month: Girls have an infamous variation in their moods to go with their progesterone fluctuations during the month. Week one, get your period, week two, feel great, euphoric almost, week three, all hell breaks loose and you are angry at everything, teary for no reason and feel fat (the fluid retention doesn't help), week four, things get better but then the physical pain begins. Repeat.

Within the year: We have a seasonal variation in our moods too. People are much more likely to fall into depression in winter. Some people have what is called "Seasonal Affective Disorder" where they fall into clinical depression every winter. Even if it's not that extreme, you can see it manifest in more subtle ways. Couples argue more in semester 1 exams than 2nd sem ones. People break up when the weather gets cold (March/April) and get together when it starts to warm (October/November). Maybe the answer is for everyone to move to Queensland, I don't know.

These things are pretty powerful. I know there are certain days when I know that I'm being short-tempered and I should be more loving etc, but I just can't shake the annoyance or the temper. Classically, they are the winter mornings of PMS days (haha). I'm sure you guys know what I mean. I still believe we need to persevere at self-control - the answer is not to let it all hang out, wear a sign that says "PMS right now, come back in 5 days" and get away with murder - but still I can't deny that these environmental things have no influence on me. To liken being in PMS to being on drugs is not that farfetched, given that progesterone is a pretty powerful hormone. The only difference is that, unlike alcohol or speed or whatever, we can't choose not to take this drug, as it's churned out by our corpus luteum without our consent.

The same goes for genetics. Lately I've become aware of how much I've become like my mother in a lot of things, despite a lifetime of trying not to be like her (I'll bet my daughter will say exactly the same thing about me, sigh). I just think that it can't be "nurture" if I've consciously tried not to be like that growing up. I hate the idea of blaming my genes for things, but I can't help but wonder if I'm being too close-minded. For example, personality disorders run in families, they've shown that with adoption studies. So maybe even if I were adopted away, I'd still be like mum, who's like my aunts, who's like grandma...

Bottom line? For sure, we need to be responsible for our own selves, and picking ourselves up from life's speedhumps (if you will) is one of them. But what of the person with the strong family history of schizophrenia or major depression or anxiety, who on top of that just lost their job, whose spouse left them and who has very little friends? Sure you can still will yourself out of self-pity, but in the absence of support, in the absence of hope (in the absence of knowing God... oh I have so much to say about that last one but I'll leave it til later...)

Hmmm I'm not explaining myself too good... maybe we should talk in person instead... over some warm coffee... in the evening... after the exams...

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

Melancholy and the infinite madness.

Though this psychiatry term is academically fascinating, it is also heartwrenchingly sad.

Mental illness is radically different to the kind of "illness" that I've been taught for the last five years. For the perpetrators of this kind of illness are not bacteria or bad food -- things that we can fight off or resist -- but inevitable stressors of daily life, like breakups, getting fired, losing someone. The bad cards that we invariably get dealt, that no one can be immune to, no one can avoid. Great if you can cope, but if you don't...

When does physiological become pathological? When does eccentric become a personality disorder? When does feeling down become depression?

Being someone who likes to ponder a lot, this term appeals to me intellectually. For one, I don't fall asleep reading the textbook. But on the other hand, I have to be mindful of the fact that while this is all well and good for me, mental illness is also probably one of the worst things that can happen to someone.

Any somatic illness has got to be better than mental illness. I would rather be a quadriplegic of sound mind than a fully-abled schizophrenic. When you have a mental illness, nothing in your world is normal. You are your worst enemy. You can't keep the noises out of your head. The stigma and fear of a "crazy person" drives your family and friends away. No one will give you a job. Strangers on the street keep well away from you. You hate yourself even more. The spiral descends. How can anyone not get crazier under such circumstances?

We treat mentally ill people really poorly. We are afraid of them, scared of what they are capable of because their mind is no longer like ours. We treat them as feral animals, like lions or tigers in the zoo. When I was in the high dependency unit that was the best analogy I could come up with. I mean, they are locked up in cells, they are on video surveillance at all times, security is always hovering around, we have to wear panic buttons if we have any interactions with patients.

I know that these measures are not put in to demean the patients, but for our mutual safety. But still I feel so much sadness for them. We as a society just want to sweep them under the carpet and focus on the normals, the ones that still have a life and future ahead of them. These people get on a carousel of abuse on the streets, stays at the psych ward, discharge when the health unit no longer has enough room, into prison when they have to steal for food, more abuse and worsening of their mental health state...

I'm not sure if there is a point in this post. But yeah, there is so much stigma and lack of empathy towards the mentally ill. And I don't think that will ever change. I mean, being afraid of people like that is what I've been taught since I was a child. Despite what I write in this post, I know it is what I will teach my kids when they walk on the street. I love my child and I wouldn't want them to get hurt, so I will simplify it as, bad person, stay away. That is all a child can understand. Black and white. But that dichotomous thinking is what will be carried with them into adulthood. Scary people, stay away.

But the scariest thing is that, seriously, no one is immune from mental illness. I swear, it could be me or you in five years time...

Monday, June 13, 2005

I just thank you Father for making me, me.

If I were a butterfly
I'd thank you Lord for making me wings
If I were a robin in a tree
I'd thank you Lord that I could sing

If I were a fish in the sea
I'd wiggle my tail and I'd giggle with glee
But I just thank you Father for making me, me

For you gave me a heart and you gave me a smile
You gave me Jesus and you made me your child
And I just thank you Father for making me, me.


(The Butterfly Song, words and music Brian M. Howard)

Thursday, June 02, 2005

A thesis of a post (Mum's rubbing off on me).

May I share with you my latest theory (first concocted over our breakfast conversation at Gloria Jeans).

Usual Disclaimer
Merely observation of a general trend + a feasible explanation of this phenomenon. Not fact, not absolute, not stereotype. So stop chasing me with your PC protests after this post.

A little exercise to start off
Think of three of the most insecure people you know.

Now tell me, what birth order are they? (Oldest, middle, youngest, only)

Theory
"Having a younger sibling makes you more insecure".

I've come to realise generally, the most insecure people I know are all oldest siblings. This is followed by middles, then youngest and only's. Which I thought was really strange, because I've always thought that the most annoying people were only children, and thus they probably were the most insecure too (haha sorry if you're an only - of course I don't mean you =P). Or it should be the babies, or the middles. But not us, the oldest ones (haha yeah I am one, sigh). We're supposed to be the independent and confident and bold ones! Or not...

So (whilst punching in 75 words/min at work) I thought of all the people I knew, and then quickly determined their a) birth order and b) state of security (as perceived by me). And I thought, heck this is pretty true! So then I thought, hmmm, why?

Hypothesis
So this could be one way to explain it. Oldests are ex-only children. So they start out just like only kids - adored, lavished with attention and positive reinforcement. Then arrives the little one, snatching away all the attention (everyone always plays with the baby first when they approach a family - observation from church and something I'm guilty of too).

The oldest child thinks, what happened? Where's all the attention gone? Insecurity develops. They try to earn it back by being loud, in-your-face etc. (I can think of soooo many oldest sibs who are like that at creche at church).

Middles also have that problem because they are ex-youngest. But the problem is not as bad because they were never only children -- they have always had to share their attention with someone else, they were never the "centre of the universe".

Youngest and only children are more secure, I hypothesise, because their role in the family has never changed with the arrival of a younger sibling. The displacement of birth order could be a source of insecurity, as children are now unsure of where they belong.

Confounders (wow this is like a proper paper hehe)

1) Measurement bias: Perception of insecurity
Of course I didn't do extensive surveys with p values and what-not to determine insecurity levels vs. birth order. I just sat there and thought of all the oldest sibs I know, c.f. all the youngests that I know, etc etc. The problem with this type of "data collection" (if you can even call it that) is that some people's insecurity is manifested more obviously than others. I mean, it could well be that youngest sibs are just as insecure but they hide it better. So therefore, the theory could well be that "oldest sibs have maladaptive mechanisms in coping with insecurity" rather than just having more insecurity per se.

A few types of behaviour I saw as testament to one's level of insecurity:
i) Attention seeking behaviour -- okay everyone likes some attention but I think that when you're constantly seeking approval from other people, it's a sign of something more

ii) Low self-esteem, which either manifests as showing off and telling people how wonderful you are, or always putting yourself down (Eeyore syndrome)

iii) Inability to take criticism

iv) Inability to spend time on your own ("nigelphobia")

2) Sample bias: People I know
The other thing is that this is only the people that I know, and I have to say that oldests and youngests are over-represented in my "data sample". Also note that the majority of the subjects are female (hey I did go to an all-girl school), but we won't get into the argument about whether males or females are the more insecure ones today.

Conclusion
So my point is that I think there is a definite trend there, based on people I know, between displaced birth order (oldests and middles) and insecurity issues. Of course, a kaleidoscope of other things determine a person's psyche, and childhood psychology does not replace human freedom or excuse responsibility (e.g. "My mum didn't love me when I was little so now I'm a killer" doesn't stand up with me). But yeah, this is just what I've observed.

Feel free to disagree, just don't get angry at me (esp if you're the oldest). And hey, I am one too! =P

Wow, my first psych paper... and I haven't even started my psych term...

Wednesday, June 01, 2005

Liars.

The next sentence is going to make me sound very naive.

But wow, people lie.

From this website (check it if you have time, it's a worthy read)...

We are lied to about 200 times each day.
Most people lie to others once or twice a day and deceive about 30 people per week.
The average is 7 times per hour if you count all the times people lie to themselves.
We lie in 30 to 38% of all our interactions.
College students lie in 50% of conversations with their mothers.

People lie to others once or twice a day. Some of these lies would have been directed at me. How many times have I been lied to this week? This month or this year?

More importantly, which ones were the lies?

When I was really little, I used to lie for no reason. I used to make up stories about lots of things that weren't remotely true, just for the sake of it. I made up aunties and uncles and cousins and pets and what have you. For my first grade composition, I wrote about my "cat". Come over one day and I'll show it to you; it actually got published in our school yearbook. (My school in HK obviously had too much money on its hands but that's another story).

Well anyway, one day, a few months into my first year of primary school, my then-best friend and I were standing outside the school waiting for the bus (this is how well I remember it). Suddenly she turns to me and goes, "I have to tell you something. Sometimes I make up things to make my story sound more interesting, but my mum taught me last night that it was wrong to lie so I'm not going to do it anymore. I just want you to know that what I said before might not have been true, but from now on I'm going to try not to lie".

Seriously, that's what she said (though I'm not sure if you'll believe me given the topic I'm writing about =P). I still remember it today, 15 years later because I'd never had anyone say that to me, ever. Now as I look back, she showed maturity waaayyy beyond her 6 years of life. Even as a 6 year old, I was too ashamed of my own lies and too proud to admit to her that I did the same thing too. I think all I said was "okay" and changed the subject. I lied about my lying to maintain my "integrity"; how rife with irony that was I can only appreciate now.

I don't know how suddenly I started thinking about this again. But the other day I just realised that I take what people tell me for granted a hundred percent of the time. I function on the presumption that whatever people tell me is the truth. To have to second-guess every fact that you're presented with throughout the day would be truly awful; living in naivety's still got to be a cut above living in a perpetual state of distrust.

But people do lie. To me, to you. Not just establishments or institutions or advertisements. People closest to you. People you trust. About trivial things sometimes, but about things that matter too. About things that would devastate you if you found out that you'd been lied to. I'm sure in the constellation of lies that I've (presumably) been told in my life, there are some that fall into the latter category.

And that's really scary. It's like, 30-38% of my life as I understand it could be a lie. A facade. Fiction. Fake. Fabricated. False.
*
(Another F word comes to mind, but for everyone's sake I'll keep it to myself.)
*
But *damn*...

Site Meter